Matches for: “humanitarian” …

How much evidence do you need?

Newly-elected AFAO vice-president Bridget Haire has a timely piece on the ABC Science website about HIV prevention technologies, calling for regulatory action to make these available in Australia.

If a person with HIV consistently takes effective anti-HIV medication, the chances of them infecting a sexual partner are close to zero. The condom, while remaining cheap, effective and sometimes convenient, is now just one part of the HIV prevention toolbox rather than the whole kit and kaboodle — in theory at least.

But in practice, access to these new forms of HIV prevention is constrained by regulatory systems, concerns about cost, and a fear of new technologies eroding the ‘condom culture’ that saw the whole scale adoption of condoms by gay men worldwide in the mid-80s, who perceived the threat of HIV, and improvised a form of protection.

Read the full article here.

Also recommended:

Tagged , , , ,

Plan to track HIV-positive visitors

Just when you thought things couldn’t get any more stupid:

HIV-POSITIVE visitors to the country could have their movements monitored or be prevented from coming altogether, under policy options being considered by the Government.

Prime Minister John Howard has written to his immigration and health ministers asking them for advice on whether HIV/AIDS poses a public health risk and on the public health implications of letting HIV-positive people into the country.

When Mr Howard said last month that he would consider stopping HIV-positive people coming to the country unless there were humanitarian reasons to let them in, his comments were dismissed by some as populist.

But this latest move suggests there is a possibility those infected could find it harder to come to Australia, or, if they can come, to move about the country without having to report their movements.

Read the full story in The Age.

The dog whistler

Silent Dog Whistle-1

I suppose it was only a matter of time before John Howard weighed into the HIV debate. In a radio interview this morning, the PM has said that he doesn’t believe people with HIV should be allowed to migrate to Australia:

“My initial reaction is no (they should not be allowed in),” he said on Southern Cross radio.

“There may be some humanitarian considerations that could temper that in certain cases but prima facie – no.”

Mr Howard said Australia already stopped people with tuberculosis coming in and this was why he supported stopping HIV-positive people as well.

Howard knows as well as I do that Australia already bars HIV-positive people from entry as immigrants in most cases. Applications for resident status by people with HIV are routinely denied on the basis that the individual’s condition would lead to undue cost for the Australian community. Getting past this barrier requires that the applicant prove there are genuine humanitarian or compassionate reasons — via a lengthy and expensive legal process.

But now Howard is apparently considering legislative change to tighten the law further. He knows that the vast majority of people know nothing about the current arrangements and won’t bother to find out. If they did, they’d immediately see this is a non-issue — only a handful of HIV-positive people getting through the process each year (a few years back, my husband was one of the lucky ones) and those that do have genuine humanitarian or compassionate grounds for doing so.

Howard’s already said that “humanitarian considerations” will continue to have effect, contradicting his claim that there is a need for tighter restrictions. This is just an opportunity for grandstanding at the expense of a stigmatised group (last election year it was gay marriage, remember?)

This is blatant dog-whistling, and it’s something Howard has proven himself adept at.

A few years ago Howard infamously offered the opinion that Australia was taking in too many Asian migrants. These days he’s not allowed to make such obviously racist remarks, but substitute “HIV-positive” for “Asian” and nobody blinks.

The yellow peril has become the HIV peril, it’s an election year and Howard’s got the dog whistle out.

ALERT: The News Limited website is running a poll: Should HIV-positive people be allowed in?

ALERT 2: The SMH website is running a poll too: Where do you stand? Ban them or not?

The sheer willfulness of it all

Like many people, I’ve been watching events unfold in Lebanon and northern Israel with growing disquiet. It’s been hard to say much so far because the world-weary part of me just takes over; saying “here we go again” doesn’t add a lot to the discourse.

I’ve also not had the benefit of considering other viewpoints, as our internet connection has been decidedly shaky and slow1, and there are better things to do than stare at slowly-loading webpages, like work in the garden, play ball with the dogs, explore our little patch of the bush.

But the thing that strikes me about this current excursion into war is the sheer willfulness of it all. The almost-palpable thirst for war, and killing, and death and destruction that permeates both sides — all sides — of the current conflict. Israel, Lebanon, Hezbollah, Fatah, Syria, Iran, the US and Australia (and, to some extent the UK, although I picked up some sense of dissent emerging there, as it did before Iraq) are all so thirsty for war, blood and death.

They couch their excuses carefully — Israel says it is acting in self-defence (by bombing busloads of escaping women and children, it seems) and Lebanon says it is being unfairly blamed for Hezbollah’s actions. Kofi Annan suggests that diplomatic efforts be made to prevent all-out war, and George Bush says no: Israel has the right to defend itself. John Howard parrots Bush, of course2. Australia’s only concern (and it took a rather long time to establish itself) is the evacuation of Australian citizens from Lebanon3, after which time we’ll presumably be happy to sit back and watch the Israelis obliterate the country, while the evacuees are gratefully returned to the land of “Fuck off Lebs“.

The G8 summit, conveniently meeting as the war breaks out, finds time to remind Israel to “be mindful of the strategic and humanitarian consequences of its actions”. It sounded like “don’t kill them too harshly” to me.

Today, after 13 days of tit-for-tat (mostly tit, as one side is infinitely better armed, more belligerent, and quick to anger than the other) it looks like this war won’t be over soon, and that many more will die — mostly Lebanese women and children, if the toll so far is any indication. If it expands to the stage that Syria becomes directly involved, I suppose all-out-war in the middle east is a real possibility, and from there any number of scenarios can be drawn. Israel’s true intent, however, probably isn’t war on that scale — they just want to use Hezbollah’s recent actions to justify bombing Lebanon back to the state of destruction, despair and hopeless subjugation it was in 20 years ago. This will increase the power of extremist groups such as Hezbollah and open Lebanon further to Syrian influence. And from there the cycle will start again.

War breeds war, hatred breeds hate, and willfulness breeds greater willfulness. It doesn’t stop until somebody on one side stops playing the game that way. And it won’t stop soon.

Footnotes:

  1. Satellite installer man is due to arrive on Thursday to broaden my band. Frabjous!
  2. Howard, born into a different world which he steadfastly clings to even today, actually said “Israel has the right to defend herself.”
  3. Unlike other countries, Australia has only agreed to pay for the evacuation of Australian citizens who usually live in Australia; other citizens who join the convoy potentially face a hefty bill. Even those who qualify for free evacuations will be required to pay if they can claim the cost on the travel insurance. Cheap bastards!

A disaster on our doorstep

Rescuers carry a body of a fisherwoman killed after a tsunami hit the area in the southern Indian city of Madras December 26, 2004.

Terrible, awful things happening on our doorstep yesterday – but for once this is the work of nature, not man. The earthquake and subsequent tsunamis have wrought terrible destruction in our region and I dread the humanitarian crisis which will undoubtedly follow.

The first I heard of this was on the SBS World News yesterday evening, and it seemed clear then that it would get much worse. It has, and it will further. The death toll – currently 11,500 – will undoubtedly rise. Millions of people are homeless across South East Asia, in Sri Lanka, Indonesia, India, Thailand, Burma and the Maldives. The waves reached as far as the East coast of Africa. Amazing.